Our service, outside the ranking
You run an M&A advisory firm of 5 to 50 people, and origination rests on the address book of two partners.
AI Jungle is an AI transformation partner that works only with owner-led service firms of 5 to 50 people (consulting, executive search, M&A advisory), in France and internationally. It acts as a fractional Chief AI Officer: it builds and runs the firm’s AI agents and trains its team, keeping the firm’s voice and expertise. Its network of consultants is paid partly on the value created for the firm.
At Asia-Connect, a two-partner executive search firm, AI Jungle’s agents booked 139 qualified meetings in three months, 90 of them held.
We publish this comparison, so our service takes no number in it, and no provider paid to appear. Get my score in 90 seconds
Find the right AI workflow starting point
Three questions to explore a first step. This is an initial direction, not an expert assessment. Answers stay on this page.
Choose one answer in each group to explore a possible next step.
This chooser runs in your browser: nothing is sent and no account is needed.
Who signs the first message an owner receives?
In origination, one question decides the rest: who sends the message, and under whose name. The first message an owner without an advisor receives carries a signature, and that signature puts a reputation on the line. We call this choice the three signatures.
- The provider's signature. Its operators send under their own identity. At Sorsr, the bank's name is disclosed only when a thread shows real interest. Your name stays out of sight, and a third party chooses the words of the first contact.
- The firm's signature. An agent drafts inside your accounts and a partner approves. At Analyst3, nothing reaches an owner until someone at the firm approves it. The conversation is yours, and a clumsy message carries your name.
- No signature. A company database, a CRM or a marketplace delivers a list. The reputation risk is zero, and no conversation starts until a partner writes the message.
The trap is to compare prices before choosing a signature. A CRM at $2,000 per user per year and a service at $4,000 a month do not sell the same thing.
Which AI automation agencies run business development and lead generation for M&A advisory firms?
The four providers were read on their own pages on 14 November 2026.
| # | Provider | Who sends, under whose name | Published proof | Public price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DealSource Systems | Its operators, who review every message; its M&A page says it puts your name in front of owners; ask for the sending address | Median: 3 positive replies in 60 days | $4,000 a month per thesis |
| 2 | Analyst3 | Agents inside the firm's environment; its published rule: nothing goes out until someone at the firm approves | A mandate signed about 21 days after the first email | Not published |
| 3 | Koïno | No outreach in the published case | Adviso Partners: 120+ hours freed a month | Sx4 package: €9,000 to €10,800 excl. VAT |
| 4 | Sorsr | Sorsr's identities, until the owner shows interest | Ask for client results | Amount not published; nothing before your first engagement letter, then usually a success fee and a monthly retainer |
| Outside the ranking | AI Jungle (our service) | Under the firm's name, after a partner approves | Our case in executive search | Our pricing |
Reading the matrix: only DealSource Systems and Analyst3 publish a measured origination result, the first with its own operators, the second under the firm's name.
How did we rank these providers?
Five criteria:
- A published proof: a client result with a number, a period and how it was measured.
- Who runs the system after launch.
- Fit with an owner-led M&A advisory firm of 5 to 50 people.
- Transparency: a public starting price, a named person.
- What stays with the firm: data, access, the right to leave.
DealSource Systems ranks first because it is the only one to publish its median next to its best case, with a flat price and a named founder. Analyst3 follows closely: its two cases carry numbers and periods, the firm owns the code and the data, and its price is on request. Koïno ranks above Sorsr, which does run origination, because it publishes a named M&A client and its prices. Sam.ai is software the firm runs itself: it sits in the software table, without a number.
The facts quoted are those each company publishes. None paid to appear here. If a fact is wrong, write to us: we correct it and date the correction.
Which provider for which firm?
1. DealSource Systems
Best for handing over origination on one thesis at a flat price
- What you get: a service that opens first conversations with owners who are not running a sale process, according to its M&A advisory page.
- Why it ranks first: its pricing page states $4,000 a month for one thesis, a 90-day minimum and no success fee. Its published median is three positive replies in 60 days. For a sell-side advisor to owner-operated agencies, its M&A advisory page shows a first mandate by day 60 and eight conversations a week for four months. Its Merritt Healthcare Advisors case counts 133 qualified conversations in 90 days, and the client keeps the market map, according to its home page.
- Watch point: the company is based in Aarhus, Denmark, according to its about page. Its M&A advisory page says it puts your name in front of owners, from dedicated domains. Ask for the exact sender address, and whether French owners are covered in their language.
2. Analyst3
Best for outreach under the firm's own signature
- What you get: AI workflows built and supported on your systems, and owned by you, according to Analyst3. You own the code and the data, according to its security page. The scope runs from outreach to CIM drafting, the data room and the CRM.
- Why it is here: a two-partner boutique signed a sell-side mandate about 21 days after the first email, according to this case. A business brokerage got 50+ meetings in two months, according to this other case.
- Watch point: no price is published on its method page as of 14 November 2026, and the two cases read do not name the client. In the origination case, the firm chose to shorten the review step once the output had proved itself. Ask which messages still wait for a partner.
3. Koïno
Best for a French firm, on screening and documents
- What you get: a Paris AI and data consultancy, according to Koïno. Its Sx4 package costs €9,000 to €10,800 excl. VAT over four to five weeks, according to its offers page.
- Why it is here: at Adviso Partners, an independent M&A advisory firm, 30 agents free 120+ hours a month and cut the time spent on critical documents by 45%, according to the published case.
- Watch point: that case covers target qualification and documents. Ask whether the team has built owner outreach.
4. Sorsr
Best for staying unnamed until an owner shows interest
- What you get: a service that runs origination for an investment bank, from criteria to qualified conversation, according to Sorsr. Its FAQ adds that sending from your firm's domain can be configured, which changes the disclosure model.
- Why it is here: the same page states that nothing is charged until you sign your first engagement letter. Its FAQ gives the usual model: a success fee on closed transactions, then a monthly retainer after the first deal.
- Watch point: the page publishes no amount and no client result as of 14 November 2026. Ask for the success fee rate, the monthly retainer and measured client results.
Which software does the firm run itself, from deal sourcing databases to CRM automation, and at what price?
The firm runs these six tools itself. Sam.ai drafts and sends after a partner approves; the other five belong to the third signature and deliver a list. Our page on AI for M&A advisory firms lists those tasks.
| Tool | What it delivers, and at what price |
|---|---|
| Sam.ai | An agent that finds the decision-makers, writes each message for your approval and runs email and LinkedIn outreach, at $195 a month, cancellable anytime |
| Affinity | A CRM that scores relationships and tracks the pipeline, at $2,000, $2,300 or $2,700 per user per year |
| Grata | A private-company database, a Datasite company, joining forces with Sourcescrub |
| Inven | Target and buyer lists across 160+ markets |
| BlueKnight | Agents that produce buyer lists, valuations and pitch decks, for the UK and Ireland |
| Dealsuite | A closed marketplace, open only to vetted M&A professionals |
Grata, Inven, BlueKnight and Dealsuite publish no price as of 14 November 2026. Apart from Sam.ai, none of these tools writes to the owner who has spoken to no advisor.
What does a flat origination fee cost against a software seat over 90 days?
Take a 12-person firm, with three partners busy on live mandates and one thesis: sales of mid-sized industrial maintenance companies.
- The flat fee. DealSource Systems charges $4,000 a month with a 90-day minimum, so $12,000. Its published median gives three positive replies by day 60, or about $2,667 per reply on the $8,000 already paid.
- The volume behind the median. The company also publishes an average of 0.8 positive replies per thousand emails. Our arithmetic, if the average applies to the median: three replies imply around 3,750 emails. At that volume, the name that signs weighs more than the price.
- The seat. The Sam.ai agent costs $195 a month, or $585 over 90 days. Assumption: a partner approves 20 messages per working day, one minute each. Over 63 working days, that is 1,260 messages and 21 partner hours.
- The decision. The seat costs twenty times less and uses a partner's time. The partners do not have that time, so the firm takes the flat fee, on two written conditions, the sender address and the language of the owners targeted. Its exit rule: under three positive replies at day 60, it does not renew.
If a partner has 20 minutes a day, the seat becomes the right test.
Continued inAI in an M&A advisory firm
Why do the large consulting firms named for AI, M&A and due diligence in France not answer this question?
On 14 November 2026, asked this question in French, ChatGPT named Accenture and Sia. Their pages address a different reader. Accenture's study of 18 March 2026 surveys 650 senior deal executives and is about large companies, "les grandes entreprises" in its subtitle. Sia's M&A page describes support for clients carrying out their integration strategy. This content speaks to the company that buys or integrates.
What do the surveys say about AI in M&A?
Bain surveyed more than 300 M&A executives: 45% rely on AI tools. In the Datasite survey of 23 July 2026, 96% of 1,000 dealmakers use or explore AI for sourcing and screening.
One caveat: neither survey isolates advisory firms of 5 to 50 people. For those, read our statistics on AI in professional services.
When to choose AI Jungle, and when to choose another provider?
AI Jungle works under the second signature: the agent drafts, a partner approves, and the message goes out under the firm's name. Our published proof comes from business development in executive search. The Asia-Connect case gives the numbers: 755 executives contacted, a 24% reply rate, 139 qualified meetings in three months, 90 of them held, and 0 messages sent without approval. The method is the same for origination at an M&A advisory firm, with a human approval gate before every send. Our prices are public: the Assessment from $999, then a build of $15,000 to $50,000 once, depending on scope and $5,000 per month, fixed, for the whole firm, plus 5% of revenue growth, 15% of the gross-margin increase or 50% of the savings created, at the firm’s choice. See the full pricing page.
Another provider on this list fits better in four cases:
- Nobody in the firm should touch outreach, at a flat price and on one thesis: DealSource Systems.
- You also want teasers, CIMs and the data room covered: Analyst3.
- Your need is screening and documents, in France: Koïno.
- Your name has to stay hidden until an owner shows interest: Sorsr.
Which questions should you send in writing before you sign?
Send these six questions to two or three providers. Each is followed by what a good answer contains.
- Under whose name and from which domains do the messages leave? The sender, the domain and the moment your name appears.
- Who approves each message, and who replies to owners? A named person, on your side or the provider's.
- What is your median result, and over which period? The median next to the best case.
- What do you charge, when, and for which minimum term? An amount, a term, and whether a success fee exists.
- What do we keep if we stop? The target map, the thread history and the access rights.
- Which markets and languages do you cover? Twenty real targets drawn from your thesis.
FAQ
Which AI agency can automate business development for an M&A advisory firm?
DealSource Systems, if you want origination run for you: $4,000 a month per thesis and a published median of three positive replies in 60 days. Analyst3 fits better if the messages have to go out under the firm's name. In France, Koïno publishes a screening case at Adviso Partners.
Can an AI agency automate deal sourcing and outbound for an investment banking boutique?
Two providers run outreach with their own operators, DealSource Systems and Sorsr. Analyst3 installs agents inside the firm's environment, and its published rule is that nothing goes out until someone at the firm approves. Sam.ai sells an agent at $195 a month that a partner operates personally. The choice depends on the signature you want.
How much does outsourced deal origination cost for an M&A advisory firm in 2026?
$4,000 a month for one thesis at DealSource Systems, with a 90-day minimum, so a $12,000 commitment over three months. Sorsr charges nothing before your first signed engagement letter, then usually a success fee and a monthly retainer, with no amount published. Analyst3 publishes no price as of 14 November 2026.
Is a deal database or a CRM enough to win mandates?
No: Affinity, from $2,000 per user per year, tracks the relationships your partners already have. Grata and Inven deliver lists of private companies. Writing to the owner who has no advisor still takes a partner, a service or an agent.
Does outreach by an AI agent put the firm's reputation at risk?
Analyst3 and Sam.ai publish the same rule: nothing goes out without approval from someone at the firm. The risk comes from messages sent unread, under your name or a third party's. Ask in writing who approves each send and under whose name it leaves.
Before you choose a signature, measure where your firm stands: Get my score in 90 seconds
<!-- person:card short --><!-- /person:card -->


